I’ve not posted for a week, but I’ve been searching like a maniac through my notes for a post I’d made. Either the heavens are in retrograde, or my mind is in a fog. The former removes control from us mere mortals, the latter removes sanity from my grasp. Anyhow, I’ll simply re-write my thoughts.
There is a wonderful tool to allow uses verification of the status of their zip code as being in a declining market. [by the way, the entire DC Metro area is defined as declining. Not so good since as of Spring 2008, DC itself continues to post year over year appreciation gains, albeit single digit. I guess I’m quibbling about mere data & money]
No buyer wants to buy in a declining market. For that reason, no seller wants to be in a declining market. One function of the tool is that it does clearly define the “market” is local, so that during a given time, Utah could be moving up, while suburban Virginia is declining. Often, people will think of “the market” as being a national entity, which it is not.
One larger reason why everyone has been very concerned is because lenders have been mandating a 5% increase in down payments for homes in a declining market. And this surely makes buyers less able to buy, sellers less able to sell. This idea is much more eloquently stated by Kenneth Harney who is a must read for people anyway.
The only reason I’m continuing to write about this and was trying to reference an earlier post was because of a change in the policy. [ I gotta figure out how to insert an ooom-pa-pa band audio right here]. This policy change, to take effect on June 1, 2008, by Fannie Mae, was in response to efforts by the NAR (National Assoc. of Realtors). Self-serving to Realtors; sure that can be. But I also think it is part of the changes being engineered by government & business to ensure a graceful cooling. I gotta think, many people were relieved in the past few days.